🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making average wages must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what average American pays. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive approach for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.