🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."